I wish to express my concern over an editorial in the Oct. 28 edition of The University Star that attributed blatantly incorrect statements to me. I was originally interviewed by Clay Thorp, a Star reporter, regarding a story about whether or not the Student Health Center should offer free sexually transmitted infections (STI) screening.
In the editorial written by Tristan Watson about that story I was accurately quoted when I said “Abstinence-only education teaches students not having sex is the only 100 percent sure way to not contract a STI. This forgoes instruction on the proper use and effectiveness of condoms.”
How do I know what goes on in abstinence-only sexuality programs? It just so happens I am co-author of the most comprehensive study ever undertaken on the status of sexuality education in Texas public schools. A copy of our highly acclaimed report is available at www.justsaydontknow.org.
In Mr. Watson’s admonition to students to remain abstinent, he states, “Providing unsuited statements like this mislead students into believing casual sex is acceptable.”
He then accuses me of “encouraging students to have premarital sex.” He continues, “Condoms and contraceptives are not 100 percent effective, and stating otherwise would be illogical.”
He closes by noting, “...educating students about responsible sexual practices at Paws Preview and orientation is not a decision that should even be considered.”
For the record, I have been a professional health educator for more than 30 years and have never once said condoms or other forms of contraception are “100 percent effective.” In addition, I have never “encouraged” premarital or casual sex.
In short, Mr. Watson fabricated those statements.
Here’s what is true.
The 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey of Texas high school students revealed 6 out of 10 graduating seniors had had sexual intercourse at least once. In addition, Texas youth rank higher than the national average in virtually every sexual risk-taking behavior and Texas ranks third in the nation in teen births. The recent American College Health Association survey of students at Texas State found almost 85 percent had participated in oral, anal or vaginal intercourse in the past year. Of those who had had vaginal sex within 30 days of the survey, a full 25 percent did not use a condom. It should also be noted there is an 85 percent likelihood of pregnancy for those who are sexually active and not using any form of birth control.
Clearly, no one needs any “encouragement” to be sexually active.
It is all well and good to hope everyone remains sexually abstinent, but the reality is far different. Some of the highest percentages of unintended births and abortions occur to college-aged females. In fact, the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy recently changed its name to the “National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy” to help focus attention on sexual risk-taking of college students.
We should absolutely be talking with students at every opportunity about responsible sexual conduct. Most of our students have grown up in the “Conspiracy of Silence” around sexual health, so it’s no wonder they make such bad and ill-informed decisions. We have only ourselves to blame if the university actively or passively participates in this silence.
The ignorance exhibited by Mr. Watson is but one example of why the Texas State community should have open dialogue about these other health issues important to college and life success.
Sincerely,
David C. Wiley
David C. Wiley, Ph.D.
Professor of Health Education
Chair, Texas Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy
President, American School Health Association
University Star, 601 University Drive, Trinity Building, San Marcos, Texas 78666 | Phone 512.245.3487 | Fax 512.2453708
Comments
Yes it is the campus
November 7, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 weeks 17 hours ago
Comment id: 1039
Yes it is the campus newspaper, but it is a serious topic that is way too often overlooked and Dr. Wiley not responding would just continue the trend. Heaven forbid someone stand up for himself regardless of how trivial the context be.
Fight for Education
November 6, 2009 by Clarissa Mata (not verified), 2 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 1037
The highly quoted, “Abstinence-only sex education teaches students not having sex is the only 100 percent sure way to not contract an STI,” Dr. Wiley said. “This forgoes instruction on the proper use and effectiveness of condoms," can be in misinterpreted in that condoms are equal to abstinence in being 100 percent effective in protecting against the contraction of an STI. The key with any contraception is that in order for them to have their full effectiveness, they must be used CONSISTANTLY and CORRECTLY. ( http://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.htm )These are the two key factors that lower the rate of the effectiveness of use, but not the effectiveness of the contraceptive itself. Using the chosen form of birth control, whether it is hormonal to prevent pregnancy or condoms (male or female) to prevent pregnancy and the spread of STI’s , lack of education on how to properly use a condom is the reason for the lowered failure rate of contraceptives. [Constant and Correct use of contraceptives is not as simple as "I took my pill everyday" or "but we used a condom... most of the time."] Even though the lower number rate is not promising to some, the 85% effectiveness of a condom is with 'typical' use, not consistent and correct use. The difference is greater than implied.] http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/UnintendedPregnancy/Contraception.htm
So, what do all these statistics this mean? We need to step up, advocate and support evidence based comprehensive sexuality education so that the individuals who do decide to be sexually active will have the medically correct knowledge to keep themselves and others safe. Yes, it is ideal to remain abstinent and for a person to delay their first sexual encounter as long as possible, but that does not mean we, as a society, should punish the individuals who have chosen to be sexually active.
In regards to the comments about Dr. Wiley acting foolish for actively standing up for himself is immature. I feel that if someone is going to interview and quote a professional; they should handle themselves and write as a professional.
David Wiley, think before you call someone IGNORANT!!!
November 6, 2009 by will (not verified), 2 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 1033
If you re-read your initial statement, your statment can make someone think you meant that condoms are 100% effective. You said “Abstinence-only education teaches students not having sex is the only 100 percent sure way to not contract a STI." Then you said "This forgoes instruction on the proper use and effectiveness of condoms.” Your implying that there is another way besides abstience to remain 100% STI free with the use of condoms. Which is wrong. The only 100% sure way is abstinence. What you should of said is that, abstience is the only 100% sure way to not contract an STI, and condoms and contraceptives help prevent STI and STD' but they are not 100% effective.
I really like the fact that you have nothing better to do than to demean a opinion writer. He's just a opinion writer. Not a health educator for over 30 years, like yourself. I also love the way you boast so produly about it. You claim to be the professional, but your taking cheap shots over a statement which can eaily be misinterpreted. I would rethink calling someone ignorant. How about a self-examination??
Mr Wiley, I care about your
November 6, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 1029
Mr Wiley, I care about your facts! As the mother of a young child about to grow up in Texas, the ignorance and fear surrounding sex education in this state astounds and frightens me.
Thank you for continuing to try and help our kids.
Peace....
i believe that one of the
November 9, 2009 by Sonia Rangel (not verified), 1 week 5 days ago
Comment id: 1053
i believe that one of the biggest problems our country suffers from is the fear of sexuality itself. we are all sexual beings and it is natural to have sex. we live in a society where we stifle our problems with trendy clothes, technology, drugs, etc, but hardly address our most intimate issues. we are taught fight for our country with guns and religion, but to fear words like vagina. we will continue to suffer from the consequences of inadequate human sexuality education unless people like david wiley advocate for our future.
Watson vs. Wiley
November 5, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified), 2 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 1026
Alright guys, duke it out.
Wiley, why are you so defensive? Stop acting like you were interviewd by Larry King. This is the university star, not the new york times.
Watson, your an extremist, but interesting.
Wiley, no one cares about your facts.
Watson, ignorant, no. Biased, opinionated, radical, yes.
Wiley, CALM DOWN!!!!
A lie that goes unchallenged
November 18, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified), 3 days 18 hours ago
Comment id: 1149
A lie that goes unchallenged eventually becomes the truth. If you're a respected professional, you will not let an opinion's writer misinterpret your words to a university in which there are 30,000 students able to read this paper.
GROW-UP
November 5, 2009 by Michael M (not verified), 2 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 1013
Big deal he misquoted you. It's not as if he's some syndicated political commentator. Those guys misquote all the time. Students are going to have lots of sex regardless, so your statistics and facts are a waste of time. Abstience, condoms, whatever, people are going to have sex.
Know the facts first
November 10, 2009 by Erika Molina (not verified), 1 week 4 days ago
Comment id: 1062
It is a shame for you to down play being misquoted in a newpaper that is affiliated to an institution of higher learning. Also, it should not matter if Watson is a "syndicated political commentator". Misquoting people for the sake of their ignorant opinion article is wrong and unscholary. Dr. Wiley's statistics and facts about sexuality education are not a waste of time. The field of health education needs more people like Wiley to fight to make changes in the way sexuality education is taught in Texas. If you were to do your research on Dr.Wiley and Dr. Wilson's study (justsaydontknow.org) you would be appalled at what kind of garbage is being taught in Texas schools regarding sexuality education. However, yes I do agree with you that "people are going to have sex". But I feel it is more important to educate youth on the importance of abstinence as well as educating them on how to protect themselves from STI's and unwanted teen pregnancies. These kids must have options for the exact reason that "people are going to have sex".
Post new comment